Long lens technique and tips

_3032710 copy
Snow duck, Hokkaido, Japan. Nikon D3, 70-300VR

Today’s article is going to be a little bit out of character for me – one of my great photographic passions used to be birding and wildlife; I don’t know how I got drawn into it, but my neighbor (and Photoshop guru, illustrator Gordon Hurden) happening to be on probably had something to do with it. I gladly spent my weekends in humid swamps, with nothing but mosquitoes and bugs for company; fortunately I managed to avoid dengue despite averaging at least a dozen bites from every session – inevitably on the tiny slivers of skin I’d forget to cover in repellant. I learned three important things from this period in my photographic career: one, patience and timing are everything; two, know your subject; and three, how to handle a long lens.

_D3T1396 copy.jpg
Eagle-Hawk. Nikon D3, AFS 300/2.8 VR

The first thing I can’t teach you, unfortunately; the second requires self-study, and the third is the subject of this article. For the purposes of simplicity, I’m going to wear the hat of a wildlife photographer, and discuss exceptions/ applications to other types of photography (sport, landscape, macro) at the end of the article. But before we begin, there are some golden rules that need to be shared and explained:

_N213460 copy.jpg
Gray heron in flight. Nikon D200, AFS 300/2.8 VR + 2x TC

Forget about hand holding: Sure, you might get off a good shot or two, but try hefting that thing around all day and not getting tired – even if you are built like Arnie in his heyday, you’re not going to be at all stable. Remember: the longer the lens, the higher the magnification; the higher the magnification, the more obvious a given degree of angular shake is going to be proportional to the size of the frame (angular frame coverage decreases as focal length increases).

You get what you pay for: Cheap, optically good, and fast: when it comes to long lenses, pick any two. There are no bargains in the super telephoto world, unless you count some of the older manual focus lenses; then you lose AF, VR and gain a whole load of weight (no carbon-fiber hoods and helicoids here). This also applies to heads, tripods and any other part of the system you can think of.

Size does matter: For small, nervous animals – some birds are a great example of this – you can never have enough millimeters. And more millimeters means more reach, but also more shake. More shake means you need to go up a size for tripods, heads, etc – anything that forms part of your imaging system and associated supports.

You may be perfectly stationary, but your subject isn’t: Even if your system is rock-solid and can give you a perfectly sharp image consistently at say 1/10s and slower, your subject is probably not going to be able to stay still for that long – don’t forget this when you’re trying to figure out why there’s still motion blur in your image: it may not be from your camera or tripod.

_N214856 copy.jpg
Bluetit. Nikon D200, AFS 300/2.8 VR + 2x TC

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the things we can do to minimize camera shake.

Increase shutter speed.
This seems like a no-brainer, but the inevitable tradeoff is shutter speed against noise: would you rather have a blurry image, or one that’s sharp but noisy? Personally, the latter gives you some options for processing afterwards, but the former may just land up being frustrating. Throw the 1/focal length rule out of the window: how slow you can go depends on your technique/ support system and subject – I limit this to about 1/60 with relatively lethargic birds, and 1/500 for hyperactive ones (hummingbirds are a good example). 1/60 also avoids the danger zone of most support systems, and You’re not going to be able to handhold a 600mm lens at 1/600s, so give up that idea.

_N212587bw copy.jpg
Duck. Nikon D200, AFS 300/2.8 VR + 1.4x TC

Mirror lockup.
Most the vibration in an exposure comes from either the action of depressing the shutter, or recoil from the mirror raising into position immediately before the shutter fires. The shutter itself is designed to be as light as possible with very little inertia so it requires little energy to move; it contributes relative little shake. Although mirror lockup (or at very least, a self timer) is a great way of removing this issue from long exposures, the main problem with wildlife photography and mirror lockup is that response is not immediate, and you’ll almost certainly land up missing the critical moment. The best way around this is to use live view, and fire the shutter that way – on most of the newer live view cameras (D800 and D4, for instance) the mirror doesn’t have to cycle before firing a frame; only the shutter fires, resulting in much lower vibration. Some cameras even have an electronic first shutter option (D4) which further lowers vibration. Needless to say, the mirrorless CSCs are the best type of camera for this kind of work thanks to their combination of reach/ crop factor and lack of a mirror; it’s just a shame that there are no serious long lens options currently available. (A good 300/4 wouldn’t cost that much and give 600/4 equivalent reach and speed – are any of the manufacturers reading this?)

_N212564 copy.jpg
Grooming. Nikon D200, AFS 300/2.8 VR + 1.4x TC

Continuous AF, or manual focus
Long lenses have extremely shallow depth of field; if your subject (or you) move by a small distance, this is very obviously translated into the focal plane sand not covered by depth of field; you will need to either use continuous AF, and control the point used manually (hint: cover the near eye of your subject) or focus manually. I did most of my wildlife photography with an old manual-focus Nikon AI 500/4 P telephoto, which was both lighter than the autofocus versions, as well as being considerably cheaper.

_N208163 copy.jpg
Moorhen. Nikon D200, AI 500/4 P and 1.4x TC

Shutter technique
I mentioned the act of depressing the shutter earlier – jabbing vertically at the button is almost certainly going to ruin your exposure through photographer-induced shake; slowly stroke the button instead from left to right, or roll the pad of your finger onto it from right to left. Either way, be gentle. Curiously the position of the shutter on the top plate makes depressing it especially susceptible to causing camera shake; I don’t know why none of the camera makers have cottoned on to this and implemented a more vertical release instead – squeezing the grip would produce far less shake, and still be just as ergonomic, if not more so. The only cameras that come to mind with a nearly vertical release are the old Olympus C-8080 and to a lesser extent, the Leica S2 – none of which are at all suitable for wildlife photography.

_N212512 copy.jpg
Hanging on. Nikon D200, AFS 300/2.8 VR

A good tripod is your best friend, and a must for prolonged telephoto lens use. Monopods are better for mobility, but lack the ultimate stability and require constant attention to keep upright – a tripod, on the other hand, is happy to stand by itself all day (unless attacked by a bear) and is far less fatiguing to use. It’s tempting to get something light – especially since you know you’re going to have to carry it to the shooting location, which might be quite far from your transport – but don’t fall into that temptation, even if some of the lighter tripods have higher load ratings than your camera system. The reason for this is small tubes – both in thickness and diameter – will be far less effective at absorbing vibration than larger ones, and smaller joins will always be less rigid. Again: you get what you pay for. Carbon fiber is preferable to steel or aluminum because of both weight and damping properties; the orientation of the weave helps with this. Wood is also another option, but a bit heavier and not so happy with moisture. I highly recommend the Gitzo 5-series systematic tripods for serious telephoto users.

_N209570 copy.jpg
The only good image I managed of a robin – they’re fast fliers and don’t stay put for long. Nikon D200, AI 500/4 P

If you need to run and gun, or are shooting with better light, or don’t plan to be out for long, then consider a monopod – it’s lighter, easier to set up, and more flexible. The same rules apply as for tripods – get the thickest, sturdiest one you can find; either attach it directly to the lens foot, or use a rigid monopod head (that permits only tilt) to minimize slop in the system. With the right technique, (see bracing below) I’ve been able to get critically sharp results from a monopod and 750mm equivalent lens at 1/30s. Note: monopods are not recommended if it’s windy; enormous lenses and their hoods tend to act like sails and windsocks and start to swing about a bit in the breeze.

_M223240 copy.jpg
Lorikeet portrait. Nikon D200, AI 500/4 P

There’s no point in spending a lot of money on a good tripod or monopod then letting it down with a lousy head – this is the critical portion of the support system. The most important thing is that the head must not be able to suddenly unlock and let go of your lens; this will make it both highly likely to result in an expensive accident, and difficult for you to adjust framing precisely. At very least, use a ballhead with tension control; I like the Manfrotto 468MG Hydrostat series. Ideally though, you probably want a gimbal head of some sort; this allows you to leave the system unlocked (providing you’ve mounted the lens at its balance point, of course) and simply aim the camera like a good artillery piece. Monopods should either have no head (screw the top of the monopod straight to the lens foot) or a dedicated monopod-only head to provide tilt. And this may sound stupid, but don’t forget to lock down the rotating collar on the lens – if it didn’t have any play in it, you wouldn’t be able to turn it. But at the same time, that play is death to stability.

_1D31556 copy.jpg
Black-crowned crane. Canon 1DIII, 500/4 L IS

If you have something to lean on, like a tree trunk, vehicle door or a wall, a beanbag can be an interesting option because it’s both stable and allows for a range of positioning; the beans mould to the shape of the lens and absorb vibration. In fact, this is one of the most stable support methods available. A cheaper (but heavier) alternative is a sack of rice. Just make sure you don’t let go of the lens, because it’s not attached to anything…

_M80_DSC4930 copy.jpg
Hummingbird. Nikon D80, AI 500/4 P + 1.4x TC

Bracing the camera lightly against your forehead via the eyecup is also a very effective way of dampening motion, because it couples it to the greater mass of your body. This is critical for monopod users, and of less importance for tripod shooters. In addition, if you’re using a monopod, it’s a good idea to put a little pressure on the monopod to keep everything under tension; hard to describe but what I usually do is stub one toe into the monopod’s foot, hold the camera at the grip and put a hand over the attachment point of the lens, whilst pushing forward slightly on the whole rig. This anchors the monopod firmly to the ground, as well as preventing the end of the lens from wobbling.

_N210426 copy.jpg
Stealth duck. Nikon D200, AFS 300/2.8 VR and 1.4x TC

Breathing techniques
Similar to bracing, this is of importance to monopod users, but less so for tripod users as you should be shooting with the head locked down, and the entire setup static. Monopods are never static by definition, so you need all the tricks in the book to maximize stability. Don’t hold your breath when you shoot; this actually increases your heart rate over time. If you’re using a long enough lens – around 700mm and up – and hold your breath and stabilize the camera against your forehead/ eye socket, you’ll actually see the finder jump a little every time your heart beats. This is obviously counterproductive. The best technique to maintain an even heartbeat (shared with me by a competition pistol markswoman) is to exhale slowly when firi…oops, I meant depressing the shutter button.

_7190026 copy.jpg
Cattle egret. Olympus E-410, Nikon AI 500/4 P

Burst shooting
Since we’ve already established that mirror lockup is not practical for wildlife photography because of the lag involved, the next best thing is to shoot in three-shot bursts – this helps with both finger-induced motion (your finger is static for the middle burst) and mirror-induced motion, and works best with high frame rate cameras. The idea is that the camera will be displaced during the first frame, stay there during the second, and move back to the rest position during the third (where you lift off) – all I can say is that it works.

_7030609 copy.jpg
Cassowary portrait. Olympus E-410, Nikon AI 500/4 P

Optical stabilizers work much better than sensor-based ones when using long lenses – this is because being at the nodal point of the optical system, they can correct for a much greater range of angular motion. However, they have their limitations – above a certain shutter speed threshold, stabilizers should be turned off; they simply don’t react fast enough and can actually cause double images. If you’re locked down on a tripod, they should be turned off too; these systems have a tendency to overcompensate for small movements of the kind that might be experienced on a tripod. Finally, although they can reduce camera motion, they can’t compensate for subject motion. Most of the time, I shot with stabilizers off.

_7020985 copy
Polo. Nikon D700, AFS 28-300VR

Application to sport photography
Most sports are shot at high enough shutter speeds (to freeze action) that a monopod is sufficient, stabilizers aren’t really required, and although the refined techniques described above can help, they’re not strictly necessary until you start to get into the borderline 1/500s region – (due to the necessity to freeze fast action). Tripods generally get in the way and don’t allow the photographer to respond fast enough to changes in action.

_M102965 copy.jpg
Blue mountains, Courchavel, France. Nikon D2H, 70-200/2.8 VR I + 1.4x TC

Application to landscape photography
Although landscape photographers tend to not use such long lenses, a sturdy tripod is still recommended especially if long exposures are required; here mirror lockup (or at very least, the self timer) will help immensely with stability. Most support systems have issues around the 1/10-1/50s region; try and avoid this if possible, especially with longer focal lengths.

_3024681 copy
Prismatic red eyes. Nikon D3, AFS 105/2.8 VR

Application to macrophotography
At first glance, this may seem out of place, but in reality, macrophotography techniques are quite similar to those for handling long telephoto lenses; stability is paramount, and the smallest camera movement is hugely magnified. The main difference is your ability to control subject lighting with flash; this allows you to freeze motion (both camera and subject) through an artificially short exposure time – limited to the actual flash duration. All of the tripod-based techniques described above are useful to the macrophotographer; I can’t think of any situation in which a monopod would be useful.

You might also enjoy my review of the Gitzo 1542 Traveller and 5562 Systematic tripods here.


Visit our Teaching Store to up your photographic game – including Photoshop Workflow DVDs and customized Email School of Photography; or go mobile with the Photography Compendium for iPad. You can also get your gear from B&H and Amazon. Prices are the same as normal, however a small portion of your purchase value is referred back to me. Thanks!

Don’t forget to like us on Facebook and join the reader Flickr group!


Images and content copyright Ming Thein | mingthein.com 2012 onwards. All rights reserved


  1. John Taylor says:

    As a keen bird photographer, usually in low light conditions, I use a monopod with a head that allows forward and aft adjustment. i find your above article extremely good, in fact it’s the best I have read on the use of monopods for birding with a long lens. I find the carry loop on the monopod is useful in applying downward pressure to anchor it, thus gives a bit more stability. I have tried a carbon tripod, but can’t get it in place quickly enough to get the shot. Thank heaven for high iso, low noise cameras. ie Nikon D800.

  2. Hi Ming,

    From your photos it looks like you’ve spent a lot of time in the KL Bird Park – I recognise many of the birds from there.

    I recently bought the M. Zuiko 75-300 II to use with an Olympus E-P3 and had been really struggling to get sharp images out of it at the longer focal lengths. During the past week or so I’ve been reading as much as I can about wildlife photography in order to help me get more out of the lens. I have to say that your article is the most useful I’ve read so far – and I’ve linked to it in one or two discussion forums elsewhere.

    The next time I’m in KL I’m going to visit the bird park again (fourth time …) and see how I get on with the 75-300 and a carbon fibre Sirui T1204x, which a smaller and lighter copy of the Gitzo Traveller (hopefully I’ll also catch up with Robin Wong and shoot some macro at the butterfly park, but that’s another story …).

    In general terms I think you’re correct about IBIS being inferior to in-lens stabilisers at long focal lengths. The IBIS in my E-P3 is completely useless with telephotos and I don’t even bother with it. However, I’ve heard that the new 5-way stabiliser in the OM-D is actually superior to in-lens stabilisers. At least, a couple of people who’ve shot with the Panasonic 100-300 say that they prefer the camera’s IBIS over the lens’s IS.

    This “quick reply” is starting to get a bit long, so I’ll sign off.

    Thanks again,


    • Yes, and in the wetlands surrounding the city. It’s a handy location for teaching/ testing because at least you know you’re always going to find some wildlife!

      As for the 100-300: changed my mind about IBIS after the OM-D – that has a better stabilizer than the OIS built into the lens. Not true for all cameras; the E-PM1 (same stabilizer as your E-P3) is rather weak and seems to cause more double imaging than it prevents – I always shot with it off.

      • PEN stabilisers are indeed weak and sometimes they introduce shake to photos that would otherwise be sharp. It’s too much bother to think about turning the IBIS on and off all the time depending on your focal length and shutter speed. I was quite upset when I shelled out big $$ for the E-P3 only to find that the IBIS was more trouble than it was worth, as that was the main reason I chose a PEN over a Panasonic camera. However, I came to like the E-P3 anyway because it’s still a good camera – despite also having the older 12mp sensor.

  3. Just starting out with a D7000 and old ED 400mm 5.6 / TC-301 / Benbo 1 from my Dad…
    Great tips and inspirational pics. Thank you!

  4. Excellent article and very impressive photos. I just purchased a Nikkor 300mm F/4 and was looking for better techniques. These are just what I was looking for. I bookmarked this page for future reference. Thanks.

  5. Great read and images as usual – thanks
    An exception that confirms the rule “shoot with a tripod with long lenses” – http://www.flickr.com/photos/nycandre/186155475/
    (200mm w/ 10D, reflex lucky shot from the hip – that hawk landed very close to me!)

    PS. correction Courchevel, not Couchavel (ok to delete whole comment )

  6. Christof Rostert says:

    Gorgeous pictures!

    Ming, is there a rule when you use vignette and when not? Just wondering.

    • Thanks – no, not really. It’s a tool to provide compositional balance if the edges of the frame are light or empty, or you want to focus attention in the center.

  7. Great article and fabulous pictures, Ming!

    Your point about not being able to hand-hold these long lenses is well taken. So I’ve always wondered why VR is put on lenses like the Nikkor 400/2.8 AF-S or the 600/4 AF-S if you have to mount these on a tripod to shoot anyway. I’ll never have the chance to shoot these exotic lenses, but I’ve always wondered about the necessity of the VR function in them.

    • You can handhold a 300/2.8, but not for very long. A 400/2.8 is impossible. VR is useful on a monopod if you’re at marginal shutter speeds – I’d say anything below 1/2x FL or so. But most of the time, you can get away without it – the 500/4 AI-P that was the mainstay of my birding work definitely wasn’t stabilized.

  8. Another great article! You didn’t touch too much on the capture of birds in flight though. Would you say all of the above applies there as well or would you try a free hand approach? I’m just not sure how you can capture birds in flight that way with a tripod. Thanks again, really enjoy your writing.

    • This is a tough one. To be honest, I never did much in the way of birds in flight because my lenses were either MF or too short. I think you’d need a gimbal head and tripod to make it work; monopods are difficult to pan with in anything other than a horizontal arc, and handheld simply isn’t stable enough.

  9. Rafael Macia says:

    Great pictures, and a great article !

    thanks !

  10. John F. Opie says:

    Lovely piece, as always. However, you didn’t mention the use of an electronic remote, which removes the need for shutter control contact between photographer and camera. That and live view means you can keep things very stable indeed. You can also brace a monopod against existing objects to increase stability, which is where a good small ball head does wonders in a clinch or where you can’t carry a decent tripod. I preferably really good monopod to a cheap tripod: you simply can’t put a ten pound camera/lens on a three-pound tripod and expect it to be stable for long nighttime exposures.

    • Thanks John. You lose the forehead bracing effect with the remote, and it always felt a little bit laggy to me – never used it. Agree ok the monopod vs tripod – I definitely wouldn’t put 10lb on a 3lb tripod, but the Gitzo Traveller 1542 is pretty impressive for 5lb or so. I’ll use my 5562 systematic without a column when I need ultimate stability.

  11. As always, a great read, and beautiful images. Particularly love “Hanging On”, the Crowned Crane and the Cassowary. I am really enjoying learning to use my D800/70-200 2.8VR/TCx2 (and adding Cannon 500d close up filter for macro) in zoos. Havn’t cracked getting shots of birds on the wing yet though. Oh, by the way, your image “Little Greebe” is wrong on 2 counts…it should be Grebe, and its isn’t, it is a Moorhen! Next Spring will be heading down our local waterways using my (hopefully honed) long lense techniques to capture both Moorhens and Little Grebes. Doubt I will see many Cassowarys(ies?)…

  12. Hi Ming,
    Great tips here.
    What’s your experience with Panasonic 100-300? Do you still have it?

  13. Digital Adrian says:

    Very informative article, as I am (a bit) into sports photography.

    A question though, you state that “it’s just a shame that there are no serious long lens options currently available. […] A good 300/4 wouldn’t cost that much and give 600/4 equivalent reach and speed”. But here you are shooting dragonflies with such a camera and lens combination:

    Am I overlooking something?

    Regards, Adrian

    • Digital Adrian says:

      The link did not get inserted, try #2:
      _5005488 copy

    • Yes – I presume you’re referring to the shots on flickr? It’s the Panasonic 100-300 on an OM-D, which is f5.6 at the long end but probably more like T8. Acceptable but nowhere near as good as a prime. Review coming soon.

  14. Ciao Ming, most informative article and the shots are just wonderful, so sharp, your shots make it seem as if the birds were sitting quietly for ages, and l know this isn’t the case, so well done.

  15. Jack McDermott says:

    A great article in many ways. Thank you.


  1. […] lens). This week I came across a few sites which discuss what’s known as long lens technique (this, this, and this) and I’ll be working to incorporate these techniques before my next visit to […]

  2. […] Images in this review were shot at one of my favorite testing and workshop locations in Kuala Lumpur for long lenses – the KL Bird Park. It’s an enclosed free-flight aviary with captive birds, which takes the chance element out of whether you’re going to see any wildlife or not. I used a monopod for support, but did experiment with handholding the lens a few times. Click here for my article on long lens handling techniques. […]

%d bloggers like this: