High ISO performance and ‘general operation’ are listed as improvements; though I think the X2 is frankly the camera that requires the least firmware improvement in the line…still, it’ll make a good thing even better. MT
reframing the world one picture at a time
High ISO performance and ‘general operation’ are listed as improvements; though I think the X2 is frankly the camera that requires the least firmware improvement in the line…still, it’ll make a good thing even better. MT
MY RECOMMENDED GEAR LIST IS HERE Or, support the site via B&H or Amazon
You can also find a handy list of all my equipment here at B&H.
3 million words and 6,500+ images in 1,700+ posts. A further 10m words in 95,000+ comments below the line. If you're looking for something - might I suggest a search?
If you enjoyed the content, please consider
-ing or subscribing - thanks for your support!
Images and content copyright Ming Thein 2012-onwards. All rights reserved
Ming, Which do you prefer: Leica X2 or Olympus OM-D? I’ll use it for a back-up to my D-800 and for go light trips. Thanks, Terry
Probably the OM-D because of the flexibility of interchangeable lenses. You’re not losing out on image quality though; if you like the 35mm focal length, then the X2 might actually work better for you.
I agree, m43 is a great place right with excellent lenses, and the OMD with IBIS. If you only wanted a pocket camera with single focal length knowing it’ll be 35mm equivalent, I doubt you will be disappointed. The X2 is quite an excellent minimal fuss (may be none) camera with very good IQ.