Interviewed on photography in the New York Times

I was interviewed on watch photography in yesterday’s issue of the New York Times/ International Herald Tribune – the full article can be found here. MT

Comments

  1. An interesting article. About watch photography—and yet only one (beautiful) photograph.

  2. Ciao Pui says:

    Excellent article and fascinating insights. The world needs more of this, “Mr. Thein has built a Web site that aims to promote philosophical debates about photography and deconstructions of the image-making process.”

    Congrats, Ming!

  3. Richard T says:

    Wow, half a million visitors a month! Great to see you in the NYT. Congrats on your well earned success Ming.

  4. Joseph says:

    Congratulations. You’re on your way !

  5. Great writeup. I’m so pleased for you.. I like the fact I will be able to say “I knew that Ming before he was world famous”

  6. xahonline says:

    “Sometimes, the beauty is in the imperfection”… exactly how I see the world I live in and everything around me ;-) Perfection can be boring or surreal… imperfection stands out, makes it unique. You doing great, your work, this blog, very nice… keep it up Ming!

  7. Ding says:

    Congratulations for the great insight of a watch photographer. Keep up the good work.

  8. Andre NYC says:

    Congratulations ! Hard work does pay in the end, esp if inspired too :D

    PS. I do appreciate fine time pieces *& complex movements, BUT the BESTEST watch in my book b/c it is ultra thin and needs NO batteries, plus is indestructible and stylish* is Citizen’s Stiletto Eco Drive – the no seconds rectangular version

    How to convey such supreme elegance/ simplicity and hyper sophistication (solar panel ! ) .. deserving of a really good image . . .and should really be in the MoMA or other museum collections

    (*) Only 3mm thick including the scratch resistant glass. Bought for about $200 only years ago.
    The best tech watch I have: never needs batteries, uses a solar panel, never had a problem, and keeps perfect time.
    Once survived intact a full hot wash/ dry cycle in my jeans, my mistake. So about as durable as a Rolex.

    • Ming Thein says:

      Thanks Andre. I suppose at $200 it’s a moot point, but the circuitry in digital/ electronic watches is not repairable if it breaks – replace only. And that longevity is something that only entirely mechanical watches have.

  9. Dillan says:

    Congratulations! The attention you are getting is well deserved.

  10. Don Root says:

    Outstanding! It seem to me that in any field, when you reach a certain level, it all becomes not about the subject at all but about life! Keep it up!

    • Ming Thein says:

      Thanks Don – I think it’s about passion – that gives you the dedication and drive to keep pushing when most people would have given up…and that’s what tends to set apart the successful (or mad) from the rest. :)

Thoughts? Leave a comment here and I'll get back to you.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 7,482 other followers

%d bloggers like this: